Package name? #2
Description
Hi, this package looks interesting! I like your API ideas too.
One suggestion, the name of the package and this GitHub repo are not very descriptive. If you called it something like monitor-expr.el, it would be much more descriptive, and it would be clear that it's an Emacs-related package. :)
Activity
GuiltyDolphin commentedon Sep 13, 2016
@alphapapa Thanks!
Hmm, I could update the GH repo to
monitor.el, but I've already got recipes withel-getandMELPA, so that might cause a few issues.It was originally called
hook, thankfully @purcell suggested that I come up with a new name, so I think it should currently cause much less confusion - andmonitorsounds better anyway 😉I'm currently working on that API - or something similar, so hopefully the README will be getting a boost soon - if not on the
masterbranch then on a secondary (until it is ready to go).