[botantony]

If PR message contains patch and other checkboxes it adds unnecessary newlines between them. Fix it by appending patch checkbox to formula_checkboxes and not formula_pr_message

Example: Homebrew/homebrew-core#314265

---

• Have you followed our Contributing guidelines?
• Have you checked for other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you explained what your changes do? Performance claims (e.g. "this is faster") must include brew benchmark results.
• Have you explained why you'd like these changes included, not just what they do?
• For bug fixes, have you given step-by-step brew commands to reproduce the bug?
• Have you written new tests (excluding integration tests)? Here's an example.
• Have you successfully run brew lgtm (style, typechecking and tests) locally?

---

• I did not use AI/LLM to create this PR, or I disclosed the tool/model below and reviewed its output; I did not attribute commits to AI and will answer maintainer questions and review comments myself without AI/LLM.

---

[Copilot]

Copilot review overview

🟡 Changes recommended

Add focused regression coverage for combined checkbox output.

Review effort: Lite
Findings: 1

Open (1)

• Add regression coverage for adjacent patch and resource/TODO checkboxes · New

What changed in this PR

Updates bump-formula-pr to group the patch checkbox with other formula checkboxes, avoiding unnecessary blank lines.

Changes:

• Collects the patch checkbox in the shared checkbox list.
• Preserves unified checkbox formatting.

File	Description
Library/​Homebrew/​dev-cmd/​bump-formula-pr.rb	Consolidates generated formula checkboxes; regression coverage should verify adjacent patch and resource/TODO checkbox output.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[MikeMcQuaid]

Makes sense thanks!