Skip to content

Please add support to connect falcon and llama models with this . #33

Closed

Description

@hemangjoshi37a

Please add support to connect falcon and llama models with this .

Activity

  1. hemangjoshi37a commented on Sep 9, 2023

    @hemangjoshi37a
    Author

    This has been referenced in #27

  2. j-loquat commented on Sep 10, 2023

    @j-loquat

    One idea for this is that you could allow up to two local models to be loaded and assigned to one or more agents. We could load one model into the GPU and the other into the CPU with some RAM allocated to it. So say llama2 into the gpu and use it for most of the agents, and then a Python optimized smaller model into cpu for the engineer agent.

  3. andraz commented on Sep 10, 2023

    @andraz

    In theory a long running process could:

    1. accumulate a queue of prompts/tasks for a specific agent
    2. swap the engine to that agent and load it in 10-30s
    3. perform actions and save the queue results of the agent
    4. then prepare queues for other agents from results
    5. repeat at 1.

    This would allow us to use big models more efficiently, not accumulating a lot of time penalty for VRAM loading times on swaps.

  4. hemangjoshi37a commented on Sep 10, 2023

    @hemangjoshi37a
    Author

    @andraz @j-loquat your solution and suggestions are looking good to implement.

  5. j-loquat commented on Sep 13, 2023

    @j-loquat

    One thing to consider with local LLM agents is that we should keep the prompts shorter than for OpenAI and reduce the temperature to perhaps lower than 0.5. Lower temp and shorter prompts makes a huge difference in local response times as per GPT4All project.

  6. Alphamasterliu commented on Oct 16, 2023

    @Alphamasterliu
    Contributor

    Hello, regarding the use of other GPT models or local models, you can refer to the discussion on our GitHub page: #27. Some of these models have corresponding configurations in this Pull Request: #53. You may consider forking the project and giving them a try. While our team currently lacks the time to test every model, it's worth noting that they have received positive feedback and reviews. If you have any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask. We truly appreciate your support and suggestions. We are continuously working to improve more significant features, so please stay tuned.😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions