Skip to content

[Re] The principal components of natural images #45

Closed

Activity

  1. cJarvers commented on Jul 17, 2020

    @cJarvers

    Oh, this looks interesting. @(whoever becomes editor for this), I'd be happy to review.

  2. rougier commented on Jul 23, 2020

    @rougier
    Member

    Thanks for your submission, we'll assign an editor soon (hopefully, because of summer vacation it may take some time). and@cJarvers volunteered to review.

  3. rougier commented on Jul 23, 2020

    @rougier
    Member

    @ThomasA Can you edit this submission ? @cJavers already proposed to review.

  4. otizonaizit commented on Aug 19, 2020

    @otizonaizit
    Member

    @rougier : in case @ThomasA does not react, I can edit this. I am not familiar with Julia, but I am interested in the reproduction of this classic paper :-)

  5. rougier commented on Aug 21, 2020

    @rougier
    Member

    That would be great, thanks.

  6. ThomasA commented on Aug 27, 2020

    @ThomasA

    Sorry, I lost a bit track of ReScience over the summer. I see that an editor has been assigned now.

  7. otizonaizit commented on Aug 27, 2020

    @otizonaizit
    Member

    @cJarvers : thanks for the offer of reviewing this submission. Are you still up for it?
    @pberkes : would you like to review this?

  8. 14 remaining items

  9. IainDaviesMaths commented on Oct 4, 2020

    @IainDaviesMaths
    Author

    Thank you everyone for the reviews and feedback on the paper! Myself and Stephen are in the process of making all the suggested edits and should be done in the next few days.

  10. IainDaviesMaths commented on Oct 5, 2020

    @IainDaviesMaths
    Author

    Most edits have been done now - just a few minor Julia edits to be made which Stephen is on top of. Will alert when the article is in final draft.

  11. IainDaviesMaths commented on Oct 21, 2020

    @IainDaviesMaths
    Author

    Hi all - I think that's all your suggestions added to the code and article now! Let me know if there's anything else to be done.

  12. rougier commented on Oct 26, 2020

    @rougier
    Member

    @otizonaizit 🛎️

  13. otizonaizit commented on Oct 26, 2020

    @otizonaizit
    Member

    @pberkes @cJarvers : I find the reorganized repo and the other changes quite good, so if there are no objections from you two I'd accept the paper and contact @IainDaviesMaths fo the details of the publication process! Please write a comment here in any case.

  14. pberkes commented on Oct 26, 2020

    @pberkes

    @otizonaizit no objections from me!

  15. cJarvers commented on Oct 26, 2020

    @cJarvers

    @otizonaizit no objections from me either. The changes address all the issues I raised. Great work by the authors!

  16. otizonaizit commented on Oct 27, 2020

    @otizonaizit
    Member

    Great. Congratulations @IainDaviesMaths : the paper is accepted! I will follow up shortly with a PR to the paper repo for the update of metadata.

  17. IainDaviesMaths commented on Oct 27, 2020

    @IainDaviesMaths
    Author

    @otizonaizit thanks for the info about proceeding, I think it is ready for publication now!

  18. otizonaizit commented on Oct 27, 2020

    @otizonaizit
    Member

    Great! Published:

    The article will appear on https://rescience.github.io/read/ as soon as these two PRs are merged by one of the editors in chief (@rougier ?)

  19. sje30 commented on Oct 27, 2020

    @sje30

    Super, thanks! Well done Iain for getting this great work published.

  20. rougier commented on Nov 2, 2020

    @rougier
    Member

    Should be online now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions