Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](iceberg) Decouple JDBC catalog metadata name #62806 - #62844

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-62806-branch-4.1
May 1, 2026
Merged

yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-62806-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #62806

### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #59502

Problem Summary:

Doris initialized Iceberg JDBC Catalog with the Doris local catalog
name. Iceberg JDBC Catalog uses the SDK catalog initialization name as
the `catalog_name` isolation key in JDBC metadata tables, so a Doris
catalog named differently from the writer catalog, such as Spark
`spark_catalog`, could not list namespaces or tables written under that
remote `catalog_name`.

This PR adds required `iceberg.jdbc.catalog_name` for Iceberg JDBC
catalog and uses it as the Iceberg SDK catalog initialization name. The
Doris local catalog name remains independent and continues to be used
for Doris namespace/table identifier semantics.
@github-actions
github-actions Bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner April 26, 2026 15:19
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Apr 26, 2026
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (2/2) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (2/2) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@yiguolei

yiguolei commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skip buildall

@yiguolei
yiguolei merged commit a62a719 into branch-4.1 May 1, 2026
32 of 34 checks passed
@morningman
morningman deleted the auto-pick-62806-branch-4.1 branch July 8, 2026 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants