Skip to content

export_web, equivalence_check: the lifecycle notes fold, and the lifecycle read is compared within a deployment (#93) - #94

Merged
tae898 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
export/lifecycle-note-fold
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

tae898 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
export/lifecycle-note-fold

Conversation

@tae898

@tae898 tae898 commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes #93.

Ports the lifecycle note fold and the F167 gate split from repin-prep to main for the October page. Lifecycle notes 7,365 -> 4,567 characters on the October rows; no other table changes; equivalence 0 failures; page_check 0 condition findings.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lj5isEaoaGCeaZe5nNoWX4

…cycle read is compared within a deployment (#93)

Ported from repin-prep (201d384, 850f607) for the October page: the
declared situations fold to one sentence per engine, the answer-check note
says only what it compared (no internal query name, no raw engine errors),
and equivalence_check compares the lifecycle read embedded with embedded and
served with served (BUGS F167). bench_common.is_censored_answer belongs to the
re-pin's graph lane, so the note uses a fallback that is False where the
helper does not exist. On the October rows: lifecycle notes 7,365 -> 4,567
characters, no other table changed, equivalence 0 failures, page_check 0
condition findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lj5isEaoaGCeaZe5nNoWX4
@tae898
tae898 merged commit 4295bd7 into main Oct 2, 2026
2 checks passed
@tae898
tae898 deleted the export/lifecycle-note-fold branch October 2, 2026 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant