[MegaRedHand]

Summary

• Gate the three ai-review.yml jobs on github.event.pull_request.draft == false so Kimi/Codex/Claude reviews only run once a PR is actually up for review.
• Keep types: [opened, ready_for_review] so PRs opened directly as non-draft still trigger (only opened fires in that case; ready_for_review fires on draft → ready).
• Issue-comment triggers (/kimi, /codex, /claude) are preserved via github.event_name == 'issue_comment' in the gate.

Test plan

• Open a draft PR — no AI review jobs run.
• Open a non-draft PR — all three AI review jobs run.
• Open a draft PR, then mark ready — all three jobs run on the ready_for_review event.
• Comment /claude (or /kimi, /codex) on any PR — the corresponding job still runs.

[github-actions]

🤖 Kimi Code Review

This change correctly prevents AI review jobs from running on draft pull requests while preserving the ability to trigger reviews via issue comments. The short-circuit evaluation in the condition (||) safely handles the case where github.event.pull_request may be null for non-PR issue comments.

Verdict: LGTM. The logic is sound and the implementation follows GitHub Actions best practices.

---

Automated review by Kimi (Moonshot AI) · kimi-k2.5 · custom prompt

[github-actions]

🤖 Codex Code Review

No findings.

The change in ai-review.yml and the equivalent guards at ai-review.yml and ai-review.yml looks correct: automatic review jobs are skipped for draft PRs on pull_request events, while comment-triggered runs still remain available via issue_comment. That matches the documented intent in the workflow header and does not affect consensus logic, state transition code, or cryptographic paths.

Residual risk is minimal and operational rather than code-level: this relies on the reusable review workflows continuing to handle issue_comment events safely, including comments on non-PR issues, but that behavior pre-existed this patch and is not introduced here. No runtime verification was available beyond static inspection because the PR only changes GitHub Actions YAML.

---

Automated review by OpenAI Codex · gpt-5.4 · custom prompt

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

Adds if: github.event_name == 'issue_comment' || github.event.pull_request.draft == false to all three AI review jobs (kimi-review, codex-review, claude-review). The condition correctly handles all four trigger scenarios: draft PRs are skipped, non-draft opens run, ready_for_review runs (because draft is false by the time that event fires), and slash-command comments always run.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge — the condition logic is correct and handles all documented trigger scenarios.

Single-file CI change with no P0/P1 findings. The if guard correctly gates on draft == false for PR events while preserving issue_comment pass-through and ready_for_review semantics.

No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
.github/workflows/ai-review.yml	Adds if guards to all three AI review jobs to skip execution on draft PRs, while preserving issue_comment triggers and ready_for_review behavior.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A[Workflow triggered] --> B{Event type?}
    B -->|issue_comment| C[Run AI review jobs]
    B -->|pull_request| D{PR is draft?}
    D -->|Yes - opened as draft| E[Skip all AI review jobs]
    D -->|No - opened as non-draft| C
    B -->|pull_request - ready_for_review| F["draft == false at event time"]
    F --> C
    C --> G[kimi-review]
    C --> H[codex-review]
    C --> I[claude-review]

Loading

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "ci: skip AI review on draft PRs" | Re-trigger Greptile}