You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Move loadImage() into Surface, and AWT out of PImage #56
Several changes necessary to move image handling into Surface so that we're not invoking AWT.
However, if that's done, we need to replace the image loading for JOGL and JavaFX as well, or have those subclass a LameKindaSurfaceAWT which has the AWT code.
There's a constructor, resizer, and some IO options in PImage that all make use of AWT code. These will all be moved to PImageJava2D inside the processing.awt package, but will need replacements for JOGL and JavaFX.
Are you trying to remove all AWT usage or just allow headless (for eg. LWJGL use)? Because large portion of Processing AWT code, such as in PImage, PFont, etc. works fine headless.
Yeah I agree with @neilcsmith-net. There's some stuff like image saving where it's headless-OK but where AWT-dependent code has become standard. For example, it looks like even in JavaFX and JOGL, BufferedImage is still the canonical solution. There might not be a way to avoid using it.
As per @sampottinger comment, LWJGL might be better placed in terms of library integration to allow a complete removal of AWT / java.desktop dependencies for a particular renderer. @benfry interesting page, but surprised to see LWJGL still under discussion - thought that had been dropped? My issue to discuss necessary changes to PApplet to support it were closed.
Activity
processing-bot commentedon Jan 20, 2020
Created by: neilcsmith-net
Are you trying to remove all AWT usage or just allow headless (for eg. LWJGL use)? Because large portion of Processing AWT code, such as in PImage, PFont, etc. works fine headless.
processing-bot commentedon Apr 16, 2020
Created by: sampottinger
Yeah I agree with @neilcsmith-net. There's some stuff like image saving where it's headless-OK but where AWT-dependent code has become standard. For example, it looks like even in JavaFX and JOGL, BufferedImage is still the canonical solution. There might not be a way to avoid using it.
processing-bot commentedon Aug 16, 2020
Created by: benfry
More here: https://github.com/processing/processing4/wiki/Exorcising-AWT
processing-bot commentedon Aug 17, 2020
Created by: neilcsmith-net
As per @sampottinger comment, LWJGL might be better placed in terms of library integration to allow a complete removal of AWT / java.desktop dependencies for a particular renderer. @benfry interesting page, but surprised to see LWJGL still under discussion - thought that had been dropped? My issue to discuss necessary changes to PApplet to support it were closed.