Repository navigation
refactor(mcp): migrate consumers and documentation to 1.0 tools - #1849
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cf774c89ff
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f71d922ca9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 74824569dd
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f496f67907
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d8a3344e08
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
Signed-off-by: phernandez <paul@basicmachines.co>
41ca8ce to
c0ea1a7
Compare
Why
SPEC-35.2 introduces the 1.0
bm_*tool surface. Existing skills, prompts, integration adapters and benchmarks still taught or called legacy tools and expected their response shapes.What Changed
Implementation Details
Project UUIDs now use
project; search usesmode,filtersanditems. Refusals are tool errors, not successful legacy conflict payloads. Multi-project routing stays explicit. Still-registered legacy tools retain labeled compatibility manuals; historical release and benchmark records remain unchanged.Testing
just typecheck, targeted Ruff checks andgit diff --check: passed.just doctor: passed in its isolated temporary project.uv run pytest test-int/mcp/test_chatgpt_tools_integration.py --no-cov -q: 11 passed. Final search/compact-search/workspace-routing andtests/mcp/test_tool_bm_search.pyrun: 70 passed.just package-check-pi: passed on the committed checkout, including generated-reference cleanliness, types, 15 tests and packaging.BM_LOCAL_PATH=.. just bench-agent-smoke(frombenchmarks/): passed, 1/1 scripted task, runat-4550a4aaf310.Risks / Follow-ups
Companion docs-site PR: basicmachines-co/docs.basicmemory.com#52